Jane Street Group stepped into the business of providing swaps for leveraged and inverse single‑stock ETFs earlier this year, appearing as a counterparty to issuers such as Defiance, Leverage Shares and T‑Rex for products tied to Strategy Inc., Rocket Lab Corp. and IonQ Inc., based on Asym Research's read of June through August filings that mostly reflect second‑quarter positions. Across Q2, Jane Street supplied roughly $1.2 billion in notional swaps to about 75 US‑listed single‑stock leveraged and inverse ETFs, translating to an estimated 2% of that market.
The firm is already a major ETF market maker, and taking on swap counterparty roles is a bigger lift that consumes more balance sheet and faces added oversight. Jane Street declined to comment. Earlier this year, it won sign‑off to expand its equity swap dealing, and in May the SEC listed Jane Street Derivatives Dealer LLC among registered security‑based swap dealers and the group of major security‑backed swap participants.
Clear Street is the top swap counterparty for single‑stock leveraged ETFs with about 21% by notional. Marex Group Ltd and Nomura each hold roughly 11%, according to the latest filings tallied by Asym. For index‑tied leveraged ETFs, Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Barclays Plc rank as the busiest counterparties, with each controlling no less than 13% of total notional. In the single‑stock arena, the only banks with 10%‑plus share are Goldman and Nomura Holdings Inc.
Non‑bank firms dominate this corner partly because bank risk rules make one‑name exposures more expensive than index exposure. Todd Sohn, chief ETF strategist at Baird Strategas, said, "Newer counterparties likely see the growth of the levered space as well as the potential lucrative revenue," "Pair that off with what may be restrictions from banks' risk departments, and that is creating an entirely new cohort of counterparties for upstart levered ETF issuers to gain their swap exposure."
Clear Street says it built its position by backing smaller ETF shops before they scaled up. Speaking for Clear Street, John DiBacco - its co‑president and global head of markets - said, "In 2022 and 2023 we directed our attention at some of the relatively new entrants into the ETF space who were below the radar of the big banks," "We chose to target this group of customers and they had phenomenal business growth."
Dealers tailor swaps to deliver an ETF's daily target move, then offset that risk through activity in the component equities, futures, or listed options. Firms such as Clear Street and Marex - typically averse to holding sizable directional bets - say their infrastructure matches the day‑to‑day hedging these funds require. "We use a combination of conventional listed options, sometimes flex, and sometimes over‑the‑counter options to protect the downside as well as the upside," DiBacco said.
ETFs pay a financing spread over benchmark rates plus other fees, post cash or liquid securities like Treasuries as collateral, and the swaps are marked to market daily. Single‑stock funds often pay more than index products, especially when the underlying shares are volatile or thinly traded, and pricing varies by issuer. Baird's Sohn tracks T‑Rex's 2x Long MSTR ETF paying roughly 1,000 to 1,500 basis points over the benchmark rate, versus about 300 for its 2x Nvidia fund.
A careful approach helps protect your savings while seeking reasonable growth over time. Join Briefs Finance CEO Jaspreet Singh on September 29th for a FREE live investor workshop, How to Profit From A Dollar That's Losing its Value, where he shows how we're spotting investment opportunities as the dollar falls. Save your spot.
A Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X ETF carries a 60‑basis‑point premium. As the category has grown, some firms have used so‑called crash puts, also called cliquets or stability notes, to offload tail risks from the swap structures.
Taking these trades is not a set‑it‑and‑forget‑it exercise. "Entering longer‑term positions means the two sides have to deal with credit risk," said Asym founder Rocky Fishman.
In the second quarter, U.S. leveraged ETF assets climbed to a high point above $200 billion, aided by the surge in single‑stock offerings. That growth is pulling more non‑bank dealers into a space long dominated by big banks and pushing market makers deeper into financing roles. For investors, it means the plumbing behind these funds is getting more competitive, and the cost of leverage plus who stands behind it can shift quickly.
There is real money at stake for the firms too. July brought a $15 billion setback during a downturn in AI stocks, yet Jane Street is pacing toward record trading revenue this year. Or, as Calamos Investments portfolio manager Jordan Rosenfeld put it: "For large market makers already entrenched within the ETF ecosystem, providing swap liquidity is a natural evolution given the attractive financing levels issuers are paying for leverage."
If you hold or are eyeing leveraged single‑stock ETFs, watch the financing spreads, collateral terms and the names on the other side of the swap. Those details largely determine what you pay and what risks are inside the wrapper.
Staying focused on fundamentals can keep your portfolio steady and positioned to prosper. Our CEO Jaspreet Singh is hosting a FREE live investor workshop, How to Profit From A Dollar That's Losing its Value, on September 29th. Sign up free to join him live.
