The Strait of Hormuz is a critical shipping route. When war broke out in the Middle East recently, that chokepoint became a weapon. Iraq felt it hardest.
So the U.S. government started looking for a Plan B. Specifically, they're pushing to revive an old pipeline that runs from Kirkuk in northern Iraq to Baniyas on Syria's Mediterranean coast. The line was first built in the 1950s and runs about 500 miles (800 kilometers). For more than two decades, it has sat idle and unused.
Syria's 14-year civil war only made things worse. But with a new government in place under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who met Trump at a NATO summit, the path forward looks possible.
U.S. special envoy for Syria and Iraq, Thomas Barrack, has called meetings to discuss reviving the pipeline. A State Department official confirmed that "the U.S. government is supporting efforts by Iraq and Syria to enhance trade routes through rehabilitating the pipeline between the two countries and expects American companies to play a role in its construction." The aim is to limit Tehran's ability to influence global energy markets.
This isn't just a government pipe dream. Some of the biggest names in energy and engineering are already involved.
Get the market news that matters in a five-minute read with Market Briefs, our free daily newsletter
Chevron Corp has signed agreements regarding possible oil developments in both Iraq and Syria and is participating in pipeline talks. TotalEnergies SE, whose CEO Patrick Pouyanne called Syria "a strategic crossroads," has been involved in expanding Syria's role as an export hub. KBR Inc, a Houston-based engineering firm, was awarded a contract by Iraq's state-owned Basra Oil Company to advise on pipeline options.
There are also smaller players like TI Capital, a Los Angeles investment firm, and UCC Holding, a Qatari company. And the politics line up in a way that hasn't for years. At the White House, President Trump met with Iraq's Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi and said that "massive new oil partnerships will be announced this or next week." Former Iraqi premier Nouri al-Maliki, viewed by the White House as too close to Iran, is not part of the picture.
The U.S. wants two things from this deal: open Iraq's oil sector to American companies, and weaken the influence of Iran-backed militias in Iraq. A working pipeline would do both.
For anyone with money in energy markets, this is a story to keep an eye on. If the pipeline gets built, it could permanently change the way oil moves out of the Middle East.
But there are big hurdles. Islamic State cells still operate in parts of Syria and Iraq, and rebuilding decades-old infrastructure is expensive.
These militias, which have publicly opposed closer energy ties with Syria's current leadership, may view the pipeline as a threat to Iranian influence and attempt to sabotage it.
The bottom line: This is early days. The talks are real, the players are serious, and the motive is stronger than it has been in years. But any pipeline that crosses conflict zones and abandoned territory faces a long, uncertain path.
For investors, the shift to watch is whether American oil companies can gain a real foothold in Iraq. That could open up opportunities in everything from construction contracts to long-term supply deals.
Join Market Briefs, our free daily newsletter, for a quick daily rundown of the markets
