For a long time, Nike was the sneaker to own in China. If you had money and wanted to look cool, you bought the swoosh.
That is not how it works anymore. Sales have fallen for eight straight quarters compared with the same periods a year earlier.
That is a hard fall for a brand that posted its best China year ever in fiscal 2021, pulling in $8.29 billion. Since then, the Chinese sportswear market has grown 51% overall. Nike did not just lose momentum. It lost ground while everyone else was running.
The "China Chic" movement, pushed by a government campaign called Guochao, has made young shoppers proud to wear local brands. Names like Anta and Li-Ning, once seen as less stylish, now feel cool. Meanwhile, a 2021 controversy over Xinjiang cotton led Chinese actor Wang Yibo to drop his Nike endorsement, and the brand's image has not fully recovered. These shifts have eroded Nike's once-dominant position among younger consumers, who increasingly see domestic labels as both trendy and patriotic.
Yaling Jiang, who runs the research firm ApertureChina, put it bluntly. "In a way, Nike has just become irrelevant," she said. "I don't think young people can remember what's the last new thing they've done."
Get the market news that matters in a five-minute read with Market Briefs, our free daily newsletter
While Nike struggled to stay fresh, its competitors figured out what Chinese shoppers actually wanted.
Adidas, which had its own problems a few years ago, bounced back by making products for the local market. Nike, by contrast, was slow to localize. The company's distribution system did not help.
During the pandemic, Nike opened a bunch of online storefronts to keep selling. But when shoppers went back to physical stores, Nike did not clean up the mess. Cathy Sparks, the new head of Nike's Greater China division, admitted the marketplace became "incredibly fragmented" and made it nearly impossible to tell a clear story about new products.
One retail consultant based in Shanghai remembers when Nike was simply the best.
"The premium brand at the time that was available was Nike. Nike was just clearly better. They had cooler designs. They were more expensive. There was more brand cache," he said.
That advantage is gone.
Sparks took over in January 2026, and she is making changes fast. Nike is working to overhaul its distribution model, which critics have described as disorganized, needlessly complicated, and heavily reliant on discounting. The bet is that fewer discounts and cleaner storefronts will let Nike sell more shoes at full price. "If we can design footwear and apparel … that's specifically targeted towards the unique needs of Chinese consumers, we'll drive full price revenue," Sparks said.
Nike also said it is working to go "deeper into local sports communities" to win over younger shoppers, according to a company spokesperson. Outgoing CFO Matt Friend told analysts that near-term revenue will likely stay in line with recent performance, so no quick turnaround is coming. He added that "profitability will bottom before sales."
Why does it matter? When a brand that once dominated a fast-growing market loses its edge for years, it is not just a China problem. It is a question about whether the company can still read the room anywhere. The Chinese consumer has changed. Nike is betting it can change with them.
Join Market Briefs, our free daily newsletter, for a quick daily rundown of the markets
