You know how apps sometimes ask you to pay for something right inside the app? There is a whole separate route where the app sends you to the developer's own website instead, and Apple still wants money from that sale.
On Thursday, August 14, 2026, Apple filed that exact amount with the U.S. District Court of Northern California.
Apple had tried to delay this step. It asked the Supreme Court to pause the lower court case, but the Court rejected the request, so Apple had to go ahead and file.
The whole fight comes down to a simple question: if an app handles a sale on its own website, does Apple still get paid? Apple's answer is yes, just at a rate it has now put in writing.
Here is what counts as a link-out purchase. An app shows a link that takes you to the developer's website, and you pay there instead of using Apple's payment system inside the app.
Apple does not process that payment, but it still wants a share. For a standard app, the share is 15%.
Small business developers would pay 5%, the lowest rate in the proposal. The partner programs, which cover video apps, news apps, and mini apps, would each pay 10%.
Subscription renewals would also carry a 10% fee. That rate matters because subscriptions repeat, so the fee turns into a recurring cost rather than a one-time charge.
Apple says the fees are not a cash grab. The company argues they help cover the costs of the tools and services developers use to build and run their apps.
To back that up, Apple pointed at Google. Apple also compared its rates with Google Play's, which takes 20% from standard apps, 10% from subscription renewals, and 15% from special programs when purchases happen through a link.
That puts Apple's rates lower on two of the three revenue categories and even on the third, which is exactly the point Apple wants to make.
Apple also noted that Epic Games had agreed to those rates, which Apple says shows its fees fit the market.
The filing is the latest step in a legal dispute that began when Epic Games challenged Apple's app store rules. Because of that rejection, Apple had to submit these rates, which will now be evaluated by the court. The outcome could set a precedent for how app stores handle external payment links.
The direct financial impact starts small. These fees only apply to purchases done outside the App Store, and most in-app buying still goes through Apple's own system.
But the proposal is a marker for investors. Apple's services business, which includes App Store fees, is a big profit driver, so even small changes in fee rates can matter over time.
Under these rates, Apple takes a smaller cut on link-out purchases than the 27% commission it had imposed on those purchases. If more sales shift to the outside route, that difference starts to add up.
How much it adds up depends on how many developers actually use external links. Some will use the outside route and some will not, which makes the revenue impact hard to predict.
The key shift to watch is whether link-out purchases become common. The more common they get, the more these rates matter.
For Apple shareholders, the real risk is precedent, because a fee in writing is a number other parties can use later.
If these lower rates spread to other parts of the App Store, the profit math changes. For the rest of us, nothing changes tonight.
You will not see different prices in your apps tomorrow. But the fees behind those apps are not permanent rules.
They are business decisions, and this filing shows they can be rewritten. When developers keep more of each sale, they have more room to build and improve the apps you use.
That may not show up in your app prices, but it can show up in the apps themselves.
