Pro Login

U.S. Cuts Deals to Break China's Rare Earth Monopoly, But Time Is Not on Its Side

A stylized illustration of a cylindrical cup with blue arrows and lines indicating a swirling or rotational motion inside the cup.
Briefs Finance
Published Oct 22, 2025
Share:
A simplified globe showing North and South America highlights mission-critical regions like Argentina lending, set on a blue gradient background with the BriefsFinance logo in the bottom right corner.
Summary:
  • Trump announced an $8.5 billion deal with Australia for rare earths access, claiming the U.S. will have "so much" of the critical minerals in one year
  • China controls over 90% of global refined rare earth production - the U.S. depended on China for 70% of its imports between 2020-2023
  • Goldman Sachs warns that disrupting just 10% of production in rare earth-dependent industries could wipe out $150 billion in U.S. economic output

Trump's Promise

President Trump made a bold claim Monday.

"In about a year from now, we'll have so much critical mineral and rare earths, and you won't know what to do with them," he said.

The statement came after unveiling an $8.5 billion agreement with Australia to develop rare earth projects and secure U.S. access.

One year. That's the timeline Trump gave.

The Reality Check

Experts say that's fantasy.

Rare earths processing takes years to develop, not months. Even with massive investment, supply chains don't materialize overnight.

The U.S. faces a massive deficit. China controls more than 90% of global refined rare earth production.

Between 2020-2023, America depended on China for 70% of its rare earth imports, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Building capacity to replace that in 12 months? Not happening.

Why This Matters

Rare earths power modern technology: • iPhones • Electric vehicles • Military equipment • Wind turbines • Advanced electronics

China's near-monopoly gives Beijing enormous leverage. And they're using it.

Earlier this year, China imposed unprecedented export controls on rare earths. That led to: • Global shortages • Disrupted supply chains • Panic among manufacturers

The Economic Risk

Goldman Sachs quantified the danger Monday.

Disrupting just 10% of production in rare earth-dependent industries could wipe out $150 billion in U.S. economic output.

That's from a 10% disruption. Imagine if China cut off supplies entirely.

This isn't theoretical. China has shown willingness to weaponize rare earth access during trade disputes.

Why China Dominates

Rare earths aren't actually rare. They're more abundant than gold.

So why does China control 90%+ of production?

Two reasons:

High processing costs: Refining rare earths is expensive

Environmental damage: The process creates significant pollution

China invested heavily decades ago while accepting environmental costs. Western countries didn't want the pollution and pulled back.

Now the U.S. is trying to catch up. But you can't build decades of infrastructure and expertise in a year.

The Australia Deal

Trump's $8.5 billion agreement with Australia is a start.

Australia has rare earth deposits. The deal aims to: • Develop Australian mining projects • Build processing facilities • Secure U.S. access to output

But developing mines and refineries takes 5-10 years minimum. Environmental reviews, permitting, construction, equipment installation - it's a long process.

The U.S. needs rare earths now. Australia's supply won't be ready for years.

Other Efforts

The Australia deal isn't the only initiative.

The U.S. is also: • Investing in domestic mining projects • Partnering with other countries on processing • Researching alternatives to rare earth-dependent technologies • Stockpiling strategic reserves

But none of these solve the immediate problem.

The Timeline Problem

Here's Trump's challenge:

What he promised: Abundance in one year

Reality: 5-10 years to build meaningful capacity

That gap matters. If tensions with China escalate and rare earth supplies get cut, the U.S. economy faces serious disruption.

The Goldman Sachs $150 billion estimate is just for 10% disruption. Full cutoff would be catastrophic.

China's Leverage

Beijing knows it holds the cards.

Rare earth export controls are one of China's most potent weapons in the trade war. They can: • Disrupt U.S. manufacturing • Damage the tech sector • Hurt electric vehicle production • Weaken defense capabilities

All without firing a shot.

The Bottom Line

Trump is right to prioritize rare earth independence.

China's monopoly is a genuine national security threat. The U.S. needs alternative supply sources.

But his one-year timeline is disconnected from reality.

Building rare earth processing capacity requires: • Years of construction • Billions in investment • Expertise China spent decades developing • Willingness to accept environmental costs

The $8.5 billion Australia deal is important. So are domestic mining efforts. But they're long-term solutions to an immediate problem.

If China cuts rare earth exports tomorrow: • U.S. manufacturers face immediate shortages • Production stops on critical technologies • Economic damage runs into hundreds of billions • No quick fix exists

That vulnerability won't disappear in a year. Or even five years.

Trump's aggressive deal-making shows urgency. That's good. But promising abundance in 12 months sets unrealistic expectations.

The rare earth challenge took 30 years to create. It won't be solved in one.

For investors, this means: • Rare earth mining stocks could see long-term growth • Companies dependent on Chinese rare earths face risks • Alternative technology companies might benefit • Volatility expected if China-U.S. tensions spike

For policymakers, this is a wake-up call that came too late. Allowing China to dominate rare earth production created a strategic vulnerability that can't be quickly reversed.

Trump's working to fix it. But catch up? Not in one year. Not even close.

Disclosure

Get Market Briefs delivered to your inbox every morning for free!

Market briefs opt-in (#63)
No fluff. No noise. No politics. Just finance news you can read in 5 minutes.

Blogs

April 3, 2026
Best Stocks to Buy Now: A Smarter Way to Think About It

Most investors start their journey the same way. They Google […]

Read More
April 3, 2026
How to Avoid Capital Gains Tax: 7 Legal Strategies Every Investor Should Know

Warren Buffett earned $704 million in dividends in 2021. His […]

Read More
April 3, 2026
How to Read a Balance Sheet (And Why Every Investor Should Know How)

You wouldn't buy a house without looking at the inspection […]

Read More
April 3, 2026
What Is a Stock Broker? A Simple Guide for New Investors

You've decided you want to start investing. You open your […]

Read More
April 1, 2026
Most Volatile Stocks: What They Are and Why They Move

You check your portfolio one morning and see red everywhere. […]

Read More
March 26, 2026
ETF vs Mutual Fund - What's the Difference and Which One Should You Pick?

Investing is not a one size fits all approach. Some […]

Read More
March 26, 2026
Nuclear Energy Stocks: Why Smart Money Is Betting on AI's Power Problem

Everyone with an internet connection is using AI to better […]

Read More
March 26, 2026
What Is a Stock Symbol? Real Examples & How To Find One

You just opened your first brokerage account and you’re ready […]

Read More
March 25, 2026
SNDK Stock: The AI Play Most Investors Forgot About

Everyone knows AI needs chips. For a while, investment dollars […]

Read More
March 25, 2026
What Is a 401k? Here's What You Actually Need to Know

When you get your first, “real” job, it often comes […]

Read More
1 2 3 16
Share via
Copy link